Dunlop FX 500 vs Babolat Pure Drive: A Comparison of Top Racquets

Vegas Tennis Team
5 Min Read

The Babolat Pure Drive has enjoyed a longstanding reputation as one of the top choices among both professional and club players, thanks to its impressive combination of power and spin, coupled with a generous sweet spot.

That said, the Pure Drive does have its drawbacks; its stiffness can hinder control, making it a less-than-ideal choice for all players.

Today, I’m excited to explore a compelling alternative: the Dunlop FX 500. This analysis aims to determine if it’s a worthy contender for those considering a change.

Dunlop FX 500 vs Babolat Pure Drive: A Comparison of Top Racquets

Dunlop FX 500 vs. Babolat Pure Drive: A Detailed Comparison

This comparison will focus on the 2025 version of the Pure Drive alongside the 2023 edition of the Dunlop FX 500.

To my surprise, these two rackets share remarkable similarities in specifications. The only noticeable distinctions are the FX 500’s slightly higher swing weight (321 vs. 317) and a marginally stiffer frame rating (69 vs. 68).

Specifications Breakdown

Specs: FX 500 Pure Drive
Version: 2023 2025
Design: Dunlop FX 500 A picture of the Babolat Pure Drive 2025 version
Head Size: 100 in² 100 in²
Length: 27 in 27 in
Strung Weight: 320 g (11.3 oz) 318 g (11.2 oz)
Swing Weight: 321 317
Head Heavy or Head Light: 4 pts Head Light 4 pts Head Light
Stiffness Rating: 69 68
Power: Low to Medium Low to Medium
Beam Width: 23mm / 26mm / 23mm 23mm / 26mm / 23mm
Composition: Graphite Graphite
Colors: Blue and Black Blue and Black
String Pattern: 16×19 16×19
Grip Type: Dunlop Synthetic Babolat Syntec Pro

Strung Weight and Swing Weight Insights

The FX 500 boasts a strung weight of 320 g (11.3 oz), a mere two grams heavier than the Pure Drive’s 318 g (11.2 oz).

It also features a slightly elevated swing weight at 321 g, compared to the 317 g of the Pure Drive. This means the FX 500 might feel a touch less maneuverable, though the difference is quite minimal.

Length and Head Size Specs

Both models sport a standard 27 in length and a 100 in² head size, providing a classic playing experience.

Balance Characteristics

Each racket exhibits a 4 pts head light balance, contributing to enhanced maneuverability on the court.

Understanding Frame Stiffness

The stiffer frame of the Pure Drive comes in at a stiffness rating of 68, slightly more forgiving compared to the FX 500’s 69.

Players with previous arm or elbow issues may prefer a more flexible option, such as the Wilson Clash 100 or the Head Boom MP.

Beam Width Overview

Both models feature a consistent beam width of 23mm / 26mm / 23mm, which is ideal for generating power.

Power Generation Potential

While both rackets fall into the low to medium power category, they lean more towards the medium spectrum, allowing players to generate formidable shot power.

Advanced players might find the added power could overshadow their desired level of control.

Analysis of String Patterns

Featuring an open 16×19 string pattern, both rackets facilitate easier topspin generation on your shots.

To learn more about how string patterns influence racket performance, feel free to read my article on Tennis Racket String Patterns.

Where to Purchase?

You can easily find both rackets at popular online retailers, including Amazon, Tennis Warehouse, and Tennis-Point.

Final Recommendations

With very similar specifications, switching between these two rackets won’t yield drastic changes in your on-court experience.

If you currently play with a Pure Drive, transitioning to the FX 500 may not provide any significant advantages.

However, if you’re considering which racket to purchase, I’d recommend going with the Pure Drive. Its slightly lower swing weight tends to be more suitable for the average recreational player.

Share This Article
Leave a comment