The Babolat Pure Drive has enjoyed a longstanding reputation as one of the top choices among both professional and club players, thanks to its impressive combination of power and spin, coupled with a generous sweet spot.
That said, the Pure Drive does have its drawbacks; its stiffness can hinder control, making it a less-than-ideal choice for all players.
Today, I’m excited to explore a compelling alternative: the Dunlop FX 500. This analysis aims to determine if it’s a worthy contender for those considering a change.

Dunlop FX 500 vs. Babolat Pure Drive: A Detailed Comparison
This comparison will focus on the 2025 version of the Pure Drive alongside the 2023 edition of the Dunlop FX 500.
To my surprise, these two rackets share remarkable similarities in specifications. The only noticeable distinctions are the FX 500’s slightly higher swing weight (321 vs. 317) and a marginally stiffer frame rating (69 vs. 68).
Specifications Breakdown
Specs: | FX 500 | Pure Drive |
---|---|---|
Version: | 2023 | 2025 |
Design: | ![]() |
![]() |
Head Size: | 100 in² | 100 in² |
Length: | 27 in | 27 in |
Strung Weight: | 320 g (11.3 oz) | 318 g (11.2 oz) |
Swing Weight: | 321 | 317 |
Head Heavy or Head Light: | 4 pts Head Light | 4 pts Head Light |
Stiffness Rating: | 69 | 68 |
Power: | Low to Medium | Low to Medium |
Beam Width: | 23mm / 26mm / 23mm | 23mm / 26mm / 23mm |
Composition: | Graphite | Graphite |
Colors: | Blue and Black | Blue and Black |
String Pattern: | 16×19 | 16×19 |
Grip Type: | Dunlop Synthetic | Babolat Syntec Pro |
Strung Weight and Swing Weight Insights
The FX 500 boasts a strung weight of 320 g (11.3 oz), a mere two grams heavier than the Pure Drive’s 318 g (11.2 oz).
It also features a slightly elevated swing weight at 321 g, compared to the 317 g of the Pure Drive. This means the FX 500 might feel a touch less maneuverable, though the difference is quite minimal.
Length and Head Size Specs
Both models sport a standard 27 in length and a 100 in² head size, providing a classic playing experience.
Balance Characteristics
Each racket exhibits a 4 pts head light balance, contributing to enhanced maneuverability on the court.
Understanding Frame Stiffness
The stiffer frame of the Pure Drive comes in at a stiffness rating of 68, slightly more forgiving compared to the FX 500’s 69.
Players with previous arm or elbow issues may prefer a more flexible option, such as the Wilson Clash 100 or the Head Boom MP.
Beam Width Overview
Both models feature a consistent beam width of 23mm / 26mm / 23mm, which is ideal for generating power.
Power Generation Potential
While both rackets fall into the low to medium power category, they lean more towards the medium spectrum, allowing players to generate formidable shot power.
Advanced players might find the added power could overshadow their desired level of control.
Analysis of String Patterns
Featuring an open 16×19 string pattern, both rackets facilitate easier topspin generation on your shots.
To learn more about how string patterns influence racket performance, feel free to read my article on Tennis Racket String Patterns.
Where to Purchase?
You can easily find both rackets at popular online retailers, including Amazon, Tennis Warehouse, and Tennis-Point.
Final Recommendations
With very similar specifications, switching between these two rackets won’t yield drastic changes in your on-court experience.
If you currently play with a Pure Drive, transitioning to the FX 500 may not provide any significant advantages.
However, if you’re considering which racket to purchase, I’d recommend going with the Pure Drive. Its slightly lower swing weight tends to be more suitable for the average recreational player.