Wimbledon Expansion Plan Faces Opposition, Heads to Court Soon

Vegas Tennis Team
6 Min Read

LONDON (AP) — Novak Djokovic describes it as a “win-win,” while Carlos Alcaraz considers it a “fantastic idea.”

Wimbledon’s ambitious expansion plan aims to introduce an 8,000-seat stadium complete with a retractable roof, alongside 38 additional grass courts, utilizing a former golf course nearby. This initiative would allow the All England Club to host its qualifying event on-site—similar to other Grand Slam tournaments—enhancing both attendance and revenue prospects.

However, some local residents are taking a closer look at the project and are not as enthusiastic as the tennis stars. As a result, the proposal heads to a judicial review in the U.K. High Court on Tuesday and Wednesday, coinciding with the quarterfinals of the tournament wrapping up next weekend.

Opponents assert their passion for tennis mirrors that of the approximately 500,000 fans who flock to SW19—Wimbledon’s famed postcode—during the two-week event.

“We cherish tennis just like everyone else,” stated Susan Cusack, a member of Save Wimbledon Park. “But we also hold a deep love for the environment, trees, and green spaces.”

This group is contesting the Greater London Authority’s approval of Wimbledon’s plans from last September, reportedly raising over $270,000 for legal counsel to combat what they label as an “industrial tennis complex.”

“They’re a massive developer. All they do is build over there,” Cusack commented.

Beyond environmental apprehensions, critics emphasize that the land, previously a golf course acquired by the All England Club in 2018, is bound by restrictions intended to preserve public open spaces.

Wimbledon’s Case for Expansion

As the oldest Grand Slam, Wimbledon uniquely holds its qualifying rounds at a separate location. The existing facilities offer insufficient practice courts, leading to world-class players sharing spaces.

“To maintain its position at the pinnacle of global sport, Wimbledon must evolve, enhancing both its on-court and infrastructure,” asserted Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, in an interview with The Associated Press.

Wimbledon trails its counterparts in attendance figures. The Australian Open sold 1.1 million tickets for its main draw this year—over double what Wimbledon anticipates for 2024—having attracted more than 115,000 during the qualifying week. Meanwhile, Wimbledon’s qualification, held three miles away at Roehampton, offers a mere 8,000 tickets.

The French Open attracted 80,000 fans for its qualifying rounds. Spectators could watch top players practice while enjoying the mini-tournament where competitors vie for essential singles spots.

Wimbledon’s expansion would allow daily attendance of 8,000 at qualifying events.

“If you observe the other Grand Slams, they incorporate community events during the initial week… along with serious tennis,” Jevans explained. “We’ll always prioritize tennis, but I wish to involve more fans. The demand for our tickets is overwhelming.”

The new 8,000-seat arena would rank as Wimbledon’s third-largest, following Centre Court and No. 1 Court, situated just across from No. 1 Court.

This plan will nearly double Wimbledon’s total grass courts—currently at 18 for the tournament and 20 for practice—by incorporating land currently designated for the iconic Queue.

Jeavans, who planned to attend the initial day of the hearing, noted that “at least seven” of the proposed new courts could be open for community use. The proposal also features two public parks, one spanning an impressive 23 acres.

Sally Bolton, chief executive of the All England Club, expressed Monday: “We remain thoroughly confident about making the necessary progress.”

The club refrained from commenting on the estimated cost of the project, reported by British media to be around $270 million.

Djokovic and Alcaraz Backs Wimbledon’s Initiative

If the plan withstands legal scrutiny, there’s an anticipated eight-year construction timeline. This means the seasoned 38-year-old Djokovic may not have the chance to compete on the new courts; nonetheless, he is hopeful for the project’s success.

“It’s beneficial for the community, for London, and our sport in general. Honestly, it’s a win-win. If it doesn’t happen, it would be unfortunate,” he remarked last Thursday.

Belinda Bencic, who debuted at Wimbledon at 17 in 2014, expressed her appreciation for the club’s commitment to enhance the experience for players.

The two-time defending champion Alcaraz echoed his support, stating that placing “qualifying very close to our current location—it’s a fantastic idea.”

Regardless of the outcome, Djokovic emphasized that Wimbledon’s prestige remains intact.

“Wimbledon is already a revered tournament, one that everyone aspires to win or compete in,” he concluded. “This expansion is merely a bonus, elevating its recognition to even greater heights.”

Share This Article
Leave a comment